[Name]
- Age
- [Age]
- Home type
- [Home type]
- Energy situation
- [Situation]
- Goals
- [Goals]
- Frustrations
- [Frustrations]
UCD Make A Difference // SDG 7 // Evidence portfolio
A record of the design-thinking work behind KovaCor. Real evidence is shown as written; unfinished research is clearly marked as pending so it cannot be confused with real findings.
The team used interviews, contextual conversations and desk research with prospective users — Irish homeowners, renters and small-business operators — to understand how they currently make sense of energy decisions.
Says
[Insert participant says]
Thinks
[Insert participant thinks]
Does
[Insert participant does]
Feels
[Insert participant feels]
Pains
[Insert participant pains]
Gains
[Insert participant gains]
| Date | Method | Participant | Key insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Date] | [Method] | [Participant] | [Insight] |
| [Date] | [Method] | [Participant] | [Insight] |
| [Date] | [Method] | [Participant] | [Insight] |
Synthesis of the empathy work produced a single Point of View statement, which in turn framed the guiding How Might We question.
Point of view
Irish homeowners and renters need a simple way to identify affordable, locally relevant energy improvements because energy information is fragmented across suppliers, grant schemes, and technical jargon that assumes expert knowledge.
How might we
How might we help people identify affordable, locally relevant energy improvements without demanding expert knowledge?
The team generated multiple solution concepts across advisory, informational and interactive formats before selecting the interactive planner as the concept that best combined feasibility with SDG 7 impact.
Selected for high impact and achievability within project constraints.
[One-line reason for rejection]
[One-line reason for rejection]
[One-line reason for rejection]
High impact · Low effort
Quick wins
Interactive plannerHigh impact · High effort
Major projects
Low impact · Low effort
Fill-ins
Low impact · High effort
Avoid
Vertical axis: impact · Horizontal axis: effort
The KovaCor site itself is the working prototype. The interactive planner accepts building, budget and location inputs, applies transparent rules against Irish datasets, and returns a ranked action plan and downloadable PDF.
Physical evidence
Customer actions
— Line of interaction —
Frontstage
— Line of visibility —
Backstage
Support processes
| Iteration | Trigger | Change made |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Early visitors could not identify the site's purpose from the homepage | Homepage restructured with a clear value proposition and three-step “How it works” section |
| 2 | [Trigger for iteration 2] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Change made] |
| 3 | [Trigger for iteration 3] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Change made] |
Testing combined observed feedback on the deployed prototype with live usage counters. Structured usability sessions are scheduled.
Finding
Early visitors could not identify the site's purpose from the homepage.
Change
Homepage restructured with a clear value proposition and three-step “How it works”.
Outcome
[Post-change observation]
Site visitors
272
Plans completed
16
Potential annual CO₂ saved
31 t
Structured usability testing scheduled — results will be documented here.
| Task | Participant | Completed? | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Task 1] | [P1] | [Y/N] | [Observation] |
| [Task 2] | [P2] | [Y/N] | [Observation] |
| [Task 3] | [P3] | [Y/N] | [Observation] |
| [Task 4] | [P4] | [Y/N] | [Observation] |
| [Task 5] | [P5] | [Y/N] | [Observation] |
| Criterion | Result |
|---|---|
| Assessment completion without assistance | 16 plans completed to date |
| Perceived relevance of the top recommendation | Content pending — awaiting real research data |
| Confidence in taking the next step | Content pending — awaiting real research data |
| Affordability of the first action | Content pending — awaiting real research data |
| Intended and measured energy action | Potential annual CO₂ from completed plans: 31 t · verified action Content pending — awaiting real research data |
Three SMART objectives, each tagged to a specific SDG 7 indicator. Target numbers remain pending until the team confirms them.
Reach [X] Irish visitors from underserved counties by [date], improving access to energy information (SDG 7.1).
Direct [X%] of completed plans towards renewable-electricity or heat-pump actions by [date] (SDG 7.2).
Enable [X] completed energy plans by [date], supporting energy efficiency (SDG 7.3).
Each completed plan on this site produces a ranked list of efficiency and fabric upgrades — a direct link to SDG 7.3 (doubling the rate of improvement in energy efficiency).
Stakeholder mapping and scope statement for the prototype.
High power · High interest
Manage closely
Low power · High interest
Keep informed
High power · Low interest
Keep satisfied
Low power · Low interest
Monitor
Justification
Irish households and SMEs face fragmented information and jargon-heavy grant schemes. A single guided planner lowers the effort of taking the first action on SDG 7.
Objectives
See section 06 — three SMART objectives tagged to SDG 7 indicators.
Deliverables
Live web prototype, interactive energy planner, downloadable PDF action plan, live prices reference, grants reference, project evidence portfolio.
In scope
Irish residential and small-business energy use; efficiency, fabric and clean-energy recommendations; SEAI-referenced grant pointers; educational scenario tooling.
Out of scope
BER assessments, contractor quotes, live grant applications, financial advice, real-time market tariffs, industrial-scale energy audits.
Constraints
[Time, team size, data-access and hosting constraints] Content pending — awaiting real research data
Assumptions
[Assumptions about user access, data recency and grant stability] Content pending — awaiting real research data
Structural containers for the risk register and ~100-hour effort breakdown.
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Risk 1] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [L/M/H] | [L/M/H] | [Mitigation] |
| [Risk 2] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [L/M/H] | [L/M/H] | [Mitigation] |
| [Risk 3] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [L/M/H] | [L/M/H] | [Mitigation] |
| [Risk 4] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [L/M/H] | [L/M/H] | [Mitigation] |
| [Risk 5] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [L/M/H] | [L/M/H] | [Mitigation] |
| Category | Hours | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research | [hrs] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Notes] |
| Design | [hrs] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Notes] |
| Build | [hrs] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Notes] |
| Testing | [hrs] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Notes] |
| Documentation | [hrs] Content pending — awaiting real research data | [Notes] |
Reflection prompts for the team, to be completed as the project closes out.
[Reflection paragraph on “What worked”]
[Reflection paragraph on “What we'd do differently”]
[Reflection paragraph on “What we learned about design thinking”]